Norman Lear has recently spoken of his
social conservatism. Maybe he is, but his show, All in the Family
was viciously anti-white racism. Every negative stereotype of lower
middle-class lumpen caucasia was thrown up. Had he satirized another
race in the same manner, he would have never gotten away with it.
Maybe the lampooning of the proles was enjoyed in the burbs, but it's
been awhile.
Anyway, there was one sketch where
Archie Bunker, the series' stooge says to a black neighbor, “I tot
you was one of da good ones.” Everybody got the joke, but it has
more societal import than that. Not to be discounted is the
undertone that for many the president was sold that way in being
elected.
For a class of Americans, it is
necessary to let others know, they are “one of the good ones” or
at least not one of the bad ones. Ted Van Dyk is among them. He
must distinguish himself from the unwashed who have no enlightened
thoughts. In a Politico article dated August 6, 2015, Ted tells us
“School Busing Didn't Work. And To Say So Isn't Racist.” Thanks
guy, all along everyone was sure busing had been a roaring success.
What took you so long?
Van Dyk wants us to know who the
villains were. “In
many places, like in Boston as Sokol describes, there was raw
racism involved in protests against busing.” He sees the other
side, “In many other places, however, there was non-racist
consternation based mainly on parents’ concern for the wellbeing of
their children.”
Actually,
he is being a bit cute. Well, that's the kindest conclusion one can
arrive at. I remember the era in Boston well. There certainly was
racism, “raw” or “cooked” is how you want to see it and it
was not limited to the melanin impaired. Driving a cab while trying
to decide on a career, I saw it up close.
Federal
Judge W. Arthur Garrity delivered his ukase that racial balance must
occur from the lowest grades to the end of high school. I doubt Van
Dyk or his ilk had a problem with the use of vast force. His quibble
was that it would probably not work.
“Elected
officials—even those strongly in favor of civil rights—began
to conclude that busing was a well-meant mistake. Presidential
candidate George McGovern, in 1971, proposed to his advisers, of
which I was one, that he would straightforwardly take an anti-busing
position. We prevailed on him not to do so because we believed
that the issue then was so emotion-laden that busing
proponents would misunderstand his opposition.”
So
Ted kinda knew it would not work but didn't want his candidate to say
it. Huge sums would be spent chasing a mirage and lives and families
would be broken, but McGovern's non-existent electability would be
preserved.
Ever
the racially pure Van Dyk saw with his bien pensant compassion how it
was not working. He had two children in the D.C. System.
Recounting the failure as he saw it and noted, “Not surprisingly,
parents from the neighborhood began looking for private schools for
their kids or moved to Maryland or Virginia suburbs—not
because of racism but because their neighborhood school no longer was
working.”
Families
in Boston left as well, but not surely with the same pure motives.
Those without sufficient income who were stuck dealt with as best
they could. Some transferred to parochial schools that, possibly to
Mr. Van Dyk's surprise, had long been to some degree integrated.
For
others it did not work out so well. My cousin, who's mom was widowed
was helped into an upscale papist high school normally out of reach
of the denizens of his downmarket neighborhood. Years later, he
related to me that almost all his old public school classmates had
legal or drug problems and had not finished school. Well what do raw
racists deserve anyway? Without any resources, one might surmise
there was some similar devastation in the minority community.
A
woman I worked with about ten years after busing told me how they
sent their son to a private academy to get him away from the by then
broken system. He quickly became friends with all the black
students. It might shock Van Dyk, but the woman said this with no
sense of horror.
Mr.
Van Dyk has made a window into the souls of white people and found
some good and others wanting. He has made a similar inquiry of the
leaders of the old civil rights movement and here is where he sees
them.
“I
have no doubt what brave leaders of the civil-rights revolution would
be saying as they witnessed today’s so-called dialogue about race.
It would go something like this:
We
did not see how hard it would be to truly free black Americans. No
more talk please of white racism by anyone or denunciations of past
and present political leaders by folk who never risked anything
in a tough period when it counted. Let us get on with the work. What
good does it do if we have a black president, black attorney general,
black judicial, execuctive, and legislative leaders at al levels,
successful black leaders in business, labor and the arts if black
communities, North and South, are plagued by high black-on-black
murder and violent crime rates, narcotics dealing and use, horrific
school dropout and incarceration rates, high unemployment, and broken
or non-existent families? All Americans need to get on this now with
tangible, practical initiatives. Enough grandstanding, self-righteous
talk. Time to separate the talkers from the doers.”
He
might be right, but the capacity of political leaders and
revolutionaries to, like the Bourbons, learn and forget nothing is
not to be despised. If the old civil-rights heroes had remained at
the forefront, no one knows how they would have felt or acted.
Nothing ever goes according to the original plan.
The
one big thing Van Dyk and all the other well meaning wonks might want
to learn is no big dirigiste social project ever works. Then again,
what wonk could ever learn that. Their souls only yearn in that
direction. No harm ever comes to them. Policy people are, as a class, Daisy Buchanans, smashing things up and not having to pay the price.
Whether
it's busing or invading Iraq, the grand plan is usually a loser.
Going back to ancient Greece, that Syracusan invasion looked like a
winner to the Athenian assembly. True, that didn't work well for
Alcibiades, but Van Dyk did not lose his career and gets published by
Politico and all the Iraq shills have not done badly according to
Peter Beinart.
Come
to think of it, why would anyone learn a lesson?